I recently saw a post by a friend that is involved in preservation of a Historic Building, specifically the home of Brother George Walton, a signer of the Declaration of Independence. The post was about the type of mortar used for historic buildings.
Did you know that mortar matters?
That’s right, the type of mortar you use to point the brick or stone on your historic house or building matters. A LOT! Repointing is a common masonry repair for historic structures. This is when failing or lost mortar is removed and replaced with new mortar.
Historic mortars are frequently lime-based and are softer and more permeable than modern Portland cement-based mortars. This allows moisture to move in and out of the mortar joint, not the historic brick. The mortar breaks down, protecting the brick. If the historic soft mortar is replaced with a modern, harder mortar, moisture will move through the brick instead. This will cause the historic brick to break down because it is softer than the modern, impermeable mortar. This leads to visual and structural deterioration of your historic building. The same thing can happen with softer stones when paired with a hard, modern mortar.
The analogy with Freemasonry was immediately obvious to me. We often call this mortar that unites us into one sacred band or society of friends and brothers, cement instead of mortar, but the meaning is the same. We are taught to spread the cement (mortar) of brotherly love and affection, using the most important tool of a Master Mason, the Trowel. It is important that we maintain the structure of freemasonry, we use the right tools and materials to ensure that it will survive for the long-term.
When brothers want to introduce change to freemasonry, we are right to question the materials they bring to our structure.
There are those that would introduce to our craft the newest fads and trends of society so that we can match the world around us. These brothers seem to get on a crusade to remake freemasonry in their image and all others are wrong if we disagree. I am open to healthy discussion about the future of freemasonry, but I am not open to wholesale changes for the sake of change.
Freemasonry should not look like society; it should look like freemasonry. We have specific tenets and maxims that have been laid out over the centuries, and we should think long and hard before we make changes to our ancient craft.
I would remind our brethren that, if freemasonry had looked like society, we would have never achieved what we have as a fraternity. When the early lodges and Grand Lodges were formed, they did not reflect society. If the lodges matched society, they would be limited to the wealthy and titled, or they would be filled with only the working class, never the twain should meet. But they did not follow the societal rules, they ensured that men of all stations in society could meet together to form the mystic bond that we so cherish even today.
It is important to use the proper materials to build and improve our structure to ensure that they strengthen the fraternity, not introduce new mortar that will deteriorate the historic structure and cause it to fail and fall.
Although the Grand Master and the Worshipful Master appear to be in charge, they are really just the guardians of the Craft. His task, and one he must take very seriously, is to ensure the success of the craft for the generations that follow.